Compassionate Family Medicine, East Genesee Street, Baldwinsville, Ny

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new written report entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safe in Pregnant Persons." Only as agonizing as the data is the fact that the written report authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News commodity, we checked with our own scientific discipline contacts to review the information and double bank check all the math. In doing so, nosotros were able to confirm two things:

1. Yeah, the report shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hibernate this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained beneath) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring fault that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this report was well-nigh certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating significant women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually show quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Tabular array iv from the written report, shown below, reveals that a full of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You lot have to read the fine print below the tabular array to see this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week marking. These are indicated equally "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the get-go 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their start or 2nd trimesters calculates to an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions amid these meaning women who were vaccinated.

It is important to notation that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known equally "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could non have perhaps occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, past definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the incorrect denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their showtime or second trimesters.

Put some other way, it is incommunicable for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the first xx weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and significant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this written report should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they obviously tried to pull a sleight-of-hand flim-flam to go far announced that vaccines are prophylactic for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the outset 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (It's a pocket-sized set up of 127 significant women, so we'd like to encounter a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to go a more than clear picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple way to explicate this with a metaphor is to imagine a pocketbook of l lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellowish?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number fifty. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, and then they declare, "l% of lemons are yellow" because information technology'south l/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit tin can't possibly be included considering they're limes, not lemons. So the correct math is fifty/50, which ways 100% of the lemons are yellow. That'southward the correct reply.

In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous ballgame" tin occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they can't go dorsum in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months before.

If vaccine scientists either can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "scientific discipline" has already failed its core promise: to offer "bear witness-based" conclusions to understand the globe around u.s..

Nonetheless when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely merits the spontaneous abortion charge per unit is only 12.6%. Why? Because they're roofing upwardly the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most probable.

In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is besides named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same mistake in other studies that ended vaccines posed no meaning risk of adverse events? For instance, hither'southward some other study he co-authored: "Agin events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study ended, "Review of VAERS reports did not place whatever new or unexpected rubber concerns after TIV-ID."

Merely is that decision based on bad math, like the report on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Possibly this same report architect has made the same systematic fault (or peradventure a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. Information technology wouldn't be the start time ane writer was constitute to accept made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how scientific discipline progresses, past pointing out errors and enervating they be addressed and corrected. We can't only have bad math and phone call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean time, it's clear that iv out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated past covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the beginning 20 weeks (at least, according to the small data set nosotros accept so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Recall: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine fasten proteins straight attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, information technology should exist no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine skillful and editor of two medical journals. Although he does non characterize this equally a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls information technology an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You can hear him in his own words in the post-obit interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that alive births may plummet by three.ii one thousand thousand over the next twelvemonth, in the U.s. alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is existence called a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and scientific discipline have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, eye attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine manufacture is at war with the homo race. And alive-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land management arbiter one time characterized man children every bit an "ecology adventure."

This is a war. A bioweapons assail. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." Information technology is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated past a desire to aid humanity, just are now conspicuously shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.

Larn more in today's heed-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

isbellturiettly.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post